Primary vs Contingent Beneficiary
During the estate planning process, it may be challenging to determine a primary vs contingent beneficiary. You might wonder whether you need both a primary and contingent beneficiary or just one over the other.
When making estate plans, a person is not obligated to name a contingent vs primary beneficiary. However, suppose the primary beneficiary or has already passed away cannot be located. In that case, the estate must pass to the next heir in line according to the probate court, even if that may be against the deceased’s wishes.
This can cause conflict within the family, delays to the probate process, and higher costs as it can take away a portion of the estate to cover legal fees.
If possible, it is helpful to name a contingent beneficiary. This means the family can avoid some of these problems if the primary is unavailable.
John has a $500,000 life insurance policy, a home valued at $800,000, a small coin collection, and one car. His will states that his son and daughter are the primary beneficiaries, and his current spouse is the contingent beneficiary. Therefore, his children will divide the life insurance policy, home, coins, and car when John passes away. However, if John passes away after his children or if his children cannot be found, then John’s current spouse would inherit all of his estates.
Most people name a spouse as the primary beneficiary and the children as contingent beneficiaries. This is typical because the spouse might still oversee the children. If one spouse dies, the other can keep the house and car and use any life insurance payments or other assets to continue providing for the family.